New Paintings, Rock Stars In London and “Buried Child”

Painting progress: I feel a bit like I’ve lost my mojo when it comes to painting. It seems like I’ve been doing it less. I’ve been working on three things: (1) a portrait of my Uncle Bill, where I am having trouble capturing his smile and the twinkle in his eye, (2) a painting of a tennis player that I’ve been meaning to do for a while but now that I am doing it, I’m wondering why and (3) a landscape vaguely based on a painting I saw at a museum in Paris, using gouache paints that Karen Fried gave me a year ago. It’s been fun trying a new medium, but it is taking a while for me to figure out how it works. I’m actually closing in on completing all three of them.

As it turns out, since drafting this, I did finish the portrait of Bill. He and his wife Marie were very close to my parents and in a lot of ways, he was like a second father for us. He was an amazing guy. He could walk into a room or a bar and within 20 minutes would be friends with everyone in the room. A quick Bill story (there are so many): We showed up at my parent’s house for Thanksgiving or some other Mahoney family reunion and it was a big Mahoney turnout. Judie had never met any of them and was understandably nervous. Bill picked up on this instantly and took us around, introducing us as “Judie and her boyfriend Nick”, a cute juxtaposition that relaxed everyone. Here is the painting. I still did not capture the twinkle in his eye or his mischievous grin, but it’s close (and probably as good as I can do).

uncle-bill

Frideric and Jimi: On the last day that Peter and Andrea were in London, we went to the Handel and Hendrix Museum. Frideric Handel lived in this house on Brook Street in Mayfair from 1723 to his death in 1759. This was the period of Handel’s greatest popularity and power. He really was the rock star of the period. His house has been restored and decorated with period paintings and furniture and some lovely musical instruments. They occasionally have concerts there, as Handel certainly did during his lifetime. You can see where his bedroom was and where he entertained notables of the day and rehearsed with singers.

A little over 200 years after his death, Jimi Hendrix rented a third floor flat in the same building (different entrance) shortly after arriving in England to become incredibly famous. A museum celebrating all of this opened a year ago immediately above the Handel one. Hendrix lived there with his girlfriend for a couple of years, composing, playing and partying. He actually became interested in Handel and bought some albums of his music. All sorts of famous musicians visited him there to jam, hang out and sometimes crash in a spare room. They have recreated his bedroom, based on photos from the time. Hendrix was interested in design and spent a fair amount of time shopping for rugs and other things to decorate the flat. His girlfriend, who left him in about 1969, possibly upset by his drug use, has lived the last 40 something years in Australia, but has come back and donated a few items. There are videos, music, what purports to be Jimi’s record collection, some guitars, etc.

It is a wonderful coincidence that these two superstar musicians lived in the same place. Little things like this are what make London so much fun.

“Buried Child”: We went with Peter and Andrea to see “Buried Child”, a play by Sam Shepard, which won the Pulitzer Prize for Drama in 1979, catapulting his career into the stratosphere. The play is largely centered around the character Dodge, played by (the) Ed Harris, in what I understand is his first London appearance. When you enter the theater, Dodge is already on the couch in a run-down house, coughing and having sips of whiskey. He stays on that couch for entire play, except for times when he ends up on the floor. He is sitting in Middle America waiting to die, his sons are disappointments, his farm is not productive (and hasn’t been for years), he has dark secrets that haunt him and his wife no longer loves him (and hasn’t for years). It’s quite a part and Ed Harris is quite brilliant in the role. His real-life wife, Amy Madigan, plays his wife in the play. She is the strongest figure in a family of men who have been broken one way or another. In the first act, you think at least one person in this family (her) isn’t crazy. In the last act, you find out you are wrong. Upsetting this disturbing apple cart is the surprise visit of Dodge’s grandson Vince, who comes with his girl friend Shelly and then leaves her there when he ostensibly goes to buy whiskey for Dodge but does not return. Shelly, ferociously portrayed by Charlotte Hope, proceeds to expose the dark secrets that have tormented Doge and his family for many years. You eventually discover that Dodges wife had a child with Tilden, Dodge’s now demented son, and that Dodge eventually killed the baby and buried it (thus the title), driving Tilden over the edge.By the end of the play, Dodge has died (but is still next to the couch), Vince is back and is going to stay (but Shelly has enough sense to leave) and Tilden has dug up the baby. This is a powerful and deeply disturbing play that is very well written and sublimely acted and produced. It was not exactly fun to watch, but I won’t forget it. Although it is set in the malaise of the Ford-Carter years on the 1970s, I think the sort of desperation and sense of failure and loss that permeates the play should have resonance in these days of Trump and Brexit. This was once a functioning family with a working business and dreams. Now that is all gone. They may not be a Trump/Brexit voters, but they fits the caricature.

Closing words: Last Sunday, I did the reading at New Unity. It was poem called “”If You Could”by Danny Bryck. I thought it was timely and powerful. Follow this link: if-you-could

Lisbon: Sintra, Fado and More

On our third day in Portugal, we went on an all-day tour of Sintra, the mountain town that was the summer retreat of the monarchy and other assorted rich people for many centuries. It is a place of great beauty which would probably take a long weekend or more to see properly. It is a 30-40 minute drive from Lisbon. We climbed hills until we reached the center of the town of Sintra, which is dominated by the Palácio Nacional de Sintra, an imposing building with weird conical towers. It is on the site of an old Moorish fort, captured as the Portuguese moved down the peninsula, gradually taking the country back from the Moors. The fort was converted to the current palace during the 14th to 16th centuries. We stopped to take pictures, but didn’t go in as there were more spectacular sights awaiting us.

From the town, we drove all the way to the top of the mountain. It was a long way up. Perched at the very top is the Palácio Nacional de Pena, an utterly remarkable building. It was built by the German-born Dom Fernando, the King of Portugal and a cousin of Prince Albert. (Actually, by the 1800s pretty much all of European nobility was related.) Fernando was known as the “artist king” and he bought the abandoned monastery at the top of the mountain to build his dream palace. It is preserved in the same state as when the royal family lived there. (The end came for the royal family in 1908, when Dom Carlos and his 8-year old son were assassinated–in suspicious circumstances–and his elder son abdicated two years later, leading to creation of the Republic of Portugal.) The palace is surrounded by a massive park, with many structures, but we did not have the time to do the exploration, which would have taken the rest of our day. So we confined our stay to marveling at the extravagant architecture of the palace and admiring the views. You had to keep reminding yourself that people actually lived here.

sintra6

sintra7

After the palace, we really only had the time to see one more thing, as we had decided to go back to Lisbon along the ocean, a much longer route. So we decided to go to the Quinta de Regaleira, a spectacular palace of an eccentric millionaire. (Sintra was the place where all the rich people in Lisbon built their summer homes, many of which are still used by the same families, although some are now museums.) The palace itself is ornate, if not exactly beautiful. But the real thing you go to see is the gardens. They were apparently designed with references to Masonic orders, the Knights Templar, alchemy and the like. There are lots of buildings and small towers, waterfalls, grottos and mysterious tunnels. One of the tunnels leads to the Initiatic Well, a subterranean 100 foot tower complete with a spiral staircase. It is all very unusual and oddly beautiful.

After this, we drove through Sintra and down to the Atlantic coast, which took quite a while as there were hills and mountains in the way. The ocean drive was very pretty, interspersed with small villages and dunes until we got close to Lisbon. We stopped for lunch along the way at a restaurant recommended by our driver and had seafood with rice and vinho verde. (One of the odd things about Portuguese menus is that they offer red, white and green wines.) It was all delicious and scenic. As we went further, we came to Cascais, a very toney suburb, which our driver told us is where rich people now live. It was a fishing village at one point, but underwent a big change during World War II, when a number of rich Brits built estates along the water as sanctuaries from the war. After the war they built hotels and made other investments and the area is now booming.

sintra12

That night, we went to a restaurant, Senhor Vinho, noted for its Fado performances. The food was good (we took a break from seafood), but the performances were what was really memorable. Fado is a style of Portuguese singing. Accompanied by two guitarists, the singers are incredibly emotive. Imagine Edith Piaf or Billy Holiday in Portuguese, only more so. It was fun to see a series of singers (three women and one man) each sing their hearts out. By the last set, we were the only patrons left (it was a Monday night), which could have been uncomfortable, but was kind of a treat.

We woke to rain our final day, so we went to the Museu Nacional de Arte Antiga, Portugal’s National Gallery. Some nice paintings. My favorite part was the Japanese screens commemorating the Portuguese traders arrival in old Japan. Judie and I wandered around a bit after that, had a bite eat at a sidewalk cafe and stopped for a glass of cherry liqueur at A Ginjinha, a tiny storefront bar that has been selling this cherry liqueur and only that cherry liqueur for that 150 years.

Lisbon: Exploration

When Peter and Andrea came to visit us again, it was understood that part of their visit would be another trip to somewhere on the continent. Last year, we went to Vienna, which was lovely but cold and this time, Judie and I were in favor some place warmer. So we suggested Lisbon. We didn’t really know much about it. It turned out to be a good choice. A few interesting facts:

  • Lisbon is pretty small and quite hilly. I was afraid that this would be a problem for Judie and her bum knee, but it turns out that the taxis (and most everything) are cheap (nothing is far away and the traffic isn’t bad), so when we had to go somewhere up a hill, we got a ride up and walked down. They also have these cute funiculars, which go straight up the steeper hills.
  • Lisbon is built on large river, just before it empties out into the Atlantic. It seems to be a natural port and you can see why it was a great spot for fifteenth and sixteenth explorers to use as a starting point.
  • Pretty much the entire old, walled city of Lisbon was destroyed in an earthquake in 1755, so there are very few really old buildings. But most of downtown Lisbon was built during the next hundred years in the same architectural style.
  • Although Portuguese is a romance language and it is almost possible to read it if you know Spanish or Italian well, the pronunciation makes it completely impossible to understand. It sounds more eastern European that western European. Fortunately, virtually everyone seems to speak English.
  • While Portugal was a colonial power for a long time, thanks mainly to their explorers getting around the Cape of Good Hope first and just being the first Europeans to show up in places like Japan, they were more of a trading-centered colonial master. Not remotely as bloodthirsty as the Brits. They ended up giving up their colonies without major wars. But you can see the influence of China, Japan, India and Brazil everywhere.
  • Portugal somehow seems to have missed most of the Twentieth century. It wasn’t really involved in either World War or the Spanish Civil War and was ruled by Antonio Salazar from 1933 to 1974. His dictatorial rule left Portugal as a pleasant backwater in Europe. It took Portugal a while to emerge from all of that and I think you can argue that it still something of an afterthought in Europe.

Day One: We arrived late in the afternoon. Taxi from the airport was under €20–a good sign for the expenses to follow. We were in a nice Boutique hotel that Andrea found and had rooms with lovely views. We had made reservations for dinner at well-known seafood restaurant called Solar Des Presuntos and discovered that it was so close that we could see it out our window. See below for room views.

With time to kill, we strolled around the neighborhood before dinner, taking in the Rossio, Lisbon’s main square since Roman times, and the Praça dos Restauradores, which commemorates throwing the Spanish out in 1640 and restoring the monarchy. The area is filled with restaurants and people milling around and drinking at cafés. Our restaurant was in a lovely tile-covered building right next to a funicular. The food was great and the waiters sang happy birthday to Andrea. After dinner, we took a different funicular up to Bairro Alto, an old district on a high hill, filled with bars and clubs. We wandered around looking for a Fado (a type of Portuguese music) club, but couldn’t find one. We ended up at a fun bar where we drank caipirinhas and the bartended gave us shots of cachaça (sugarcane liquor) when he heard it was Andrea’s birthday. We somehow stumbled bak to the hotel.

Day Two: Andrea had arranged for a half-day private tour of Lisbon for our first full day, so George picked us up in van and drove us up to his favorite lookout. The classic viewing spot is Castelo de São Jorge, a restored medieval castle which overlooks the old city. The guide said that there isn’t that much to see when you are inside and if you are really just going for the view, the one we went to was better because it was (a) free and (b) had the castle as part of the view. We proceeded to drive all around old Lisbon and out along the river toward Belém. It had once been the port of Lisbon and was where Vasco de Gama departed on his famous exploration. It had been made up of docks and warehouses and the like, but as the harbor moved to a place that was better for container ships (a familiar story), the area gradually gentrified around the beautiful old buildings and the entire shoreline was turned into museums and various monuments. We stopped to check out the Torre de Belém, a spectacular defensive tower built into the edge of the river. It is built in what is called the Manueline architecture style, a sort of hodgepodge of Moorish, Gothic and Renaissance influences that is typical of the construction following the earthquake. You see a lot of it around Lisbon. We also stopped at the Mosterio dos Jerónimos, a large monastery along the river which houses the remains of national heroes such as de Gama (who actually died in Goa and was brought back decades later). The exterior is lovely and Peter and Andrea went back to see the interior and Vasco, who they felt a special kinship with, having seen the place in Goa where he was originally buried.

By this time, it was early afternoon and our guide dropped us off at the Praça do Comércio, a large square surrounded on three sides by imposing buildings and by the water on the fourth. There were a number of cafés with seating on the square, so we chose one and had lunch. It was a sunny day in the mid 60s and the view was wonderful and the food and wine were good. A lot more fun than shivering in London or New York. After lunch, we wandered around the square taking pictures and checking out the tables under the arches where folk-ware and knickknacks were for sale. I realized as we were leaving that we were pretty close to The Sé, Lisbon’s cathedral. So we walked over there. It was a short, uphill hike and on the way we passed the Igreja de Santo António, a church built on the spot where St. Anthony was supposedly born. St. Anthony actually went to Italy, where he did all his saintly stuff in Parma, but Lisbon adopted the hometown boy as their patron saint. The little church (reconstructed after the earthquake) was very cute. In some ways, it was nicer than the cathedral (built in 1147 where the Moor’s old mosque had been, destroyed by the earthquake and reconstructed over centuries in a variety of styles).

Judie and I took a small tourist vehicle back to hotel, so she could rest her leg and do some work. I took it easy for a while and then decided to take the funicular behind the building up to the top of the hill and wander around up there. As I was leaving, I met Peter and Andrea, returning from shopping and walking. They came with me. It turned that the funicular is the oldest in Lisbon and has a cute little “station” at the top of the hill. We walked over the Jardin de Torel, a jewel of a little park overlooking Lisbon. The ridge of the hill we were on was lined with large palaces, a few of which had been converted into what I’m guessing are very snazzy hotels. As the sun was setting, it was a great spot of photos, some of which follow.

That evening, we went back up to the Bairro Alto for more seafood, this time at Mar ao Carmo, a restaurant on a cute square. Since we were leaving to go for a tour of Sintra the next morning, we decided to skip exploring the bars and clubs again and just walked back down the hill to our hotel. To be continued…..

Visitors, “Art” and News from London

Our friends Peter and Andrea Rothberg are visiting (since Thursday). They are back for a second time and we have just returned from a wonderful long weekend in Lisbon. (More about that in a different post.) We went to the Tate Modern to see the Sir Elton John photography exhibit which I wrote about earlier. We also had time to see some of the other permanent exhibits. We were in the Rothko Room, full of paintings that were originally painted for the Four Seasons restaurant in New York, when the museum closed and we were asked to leave. (Rothko cancelled the commissions and gave the works to the Tate. He committed suicide the week after they were installed.) I also discovered that the new wing of Tate Modern has a great view-point of London. See below.

london-tate-view

“Art”: On the Friday after Andrea and Peter arrived, we went to the Old Vic to see “Art”, a play by the French playwright, Yazmina Reza, translated by Christopher Hampton. It is the 20th anniversary of its first production in London. (We saw it on Broadway with Alan Alda, Joe Morton and George Wendt sometime around 1999.) It is a play that is really about the relationships between three men. One of the three friends, Serge, has purchased an expensive, large painting that is entirely white. Serge, played by Rufus Sewall (probably best known for his recent portrayal of Lord M in the TV series “Victoria”) is a fan of this minimalist modern style and loves his painting. He invites his best friend, Marc (played by Paul Ritter), over and proudly shows it to him. Marc immediately hates it and is aghast that Serge bought it. He cannot conceal his alarm, anger and disgust. The rest of the play is about how their friendship is almost destroyed by the purchase of the painting. Marc feels betrayed and furious that Serge could have bought such a thing. And Serge is equally furious at what he sees as Marc’s condescending attitude and rigidity. Along the way, their other friend, Yvan (hysterically played by Tim West), finds himself in the middle of the argument. He tries to like the painting (even though he doesn’t really), which infuriates Marc and then infuriates Serge when he admits he doesn’t really like it that much. He becomes their punching bag as they fight with each other. It is a fascinating look at the nature of male friendship, as the rift caused by the disagreement about art escalates into increasingly hurtful statements about other, more personal subjects. And you could say that it is about men’s lack of empathy and the inability of individuals with strongly held beliefs to admit that someone with equally strong opposing beliefs may not be a fool. As the director’s notes point out, this second underlying theme has a great resonance today, in an England divided by Brexit and a world divided by Trump, where the opposing camps cannot bring themselves to even talk civilly to each other. It is wonderful and cleverly written in a style that is reminiscent of Stoppard. It takes a simple concept and creates a parable about life and friendship. And it manages the seemingly impossible by coming up with a resolution that does not seem contrived and is somehow satisfying. Another thing I’m going to miss about London: The Old Vic.

art

It Looks Like We Will Avoid Deportation: You may recall that we were somewhat concerned that our visas are scheduled to expire on the 9th of February, but we intend to keep living here until early April. We were concerned that Judie might be closely questioned upon our return from Lisbon and she had letters from the law firm explaining that she was now officially working in the New York office (and therefore no longer needs anything more than a visitor’s visa). The immigration law specialist hired by the firm seemed to think that there was a possibility that it would not work and we would have to leave or something. But, as it turned out, the Immigration person had no interest in Judie’s letters and just let us in on visitor’s visas with virtually no fuss at all. It was a relief for us, as this particular detail of our repatriation has been worrying us for weeks.

Brexit Update: May Wins, Labour in Disarray: This week the entire Breixt process leading to the UK leaving the EU became officially irreversible (although it has seemed like an unstoppable lava flow for months). In response to the High Court’s ruling that the Article 50 notice (beginning the process of leaving the EU) had to be approved by Parliament, the Conservative submitted a very short bill that gives Theresa May a blank check. The Tories were solidly behind it (except for Kenneth Clark, a voice crying out in the darkness that has become the Conservative Party) and beat back efforts by some MPS to amend the bill. The Scottish National Party was opposed. Corbyn and Labour found themselves in a difficult spot. Many of the traditional Labour constituencies in the Midlands and elsewhere voted heavily to leave and they were justifiably concerned that voting against the triggering of Article 50 might lead to an electoral rout. So Corbyn decided that Labour had to support the bill and ordered a “Three-line whip” be issued. (This is a message to the Labour MPs about an upcoming vote. If the message is underlined once, the members are urged to come and vote, underlined twice and the members are told that this is a very important matter. If it is underlined three times, the MPs are told that they must vote and are instructed on how they must vote.) About 50 Labour MPs defied Corbyn (and the three-line whip) and voted against the bill. They were from places that voted overwhelmingly to remain in the EU and really had to oppose it. But this is simply not done in Parliament and this sort of rebelliousness is unusual. Several front-benchers in the shadow cabinet voted against the bill and therefore had to resign their positions. Why Corbyn couldn’t have given his members a “free vote”, avoiding the inevitable resistance is beyond me. It all just reinforces the pre-existing story line that he doesn’t know what he is doing and that Labour is in disarray. So May wins overwhelmingly (so overwhelmingly that there is no chance of the House of Lords doing anything) and the Brexit process will start in the next six weeks. The two-year negotiations are unlikely to go well or even be completed, so this could turn out to be a Pyrrhic victory for her.

A Brief Political Rant: We are living in such a weird time. A few hundred thousand votes and Hillary is President, there might be a Democratic majority in the Senate and all the pundits would be writing about the dismal future of the GOP. But for whatever reason, those votes did not materialize and we are faced with Trump, which would be bad enough for one lifetime, but also a Republican Party whose awful partisanship and refusal to govern has been rewarded. With Republicans in charge, one would expect all sorts of terrible things–giveaways to the rich, attempts to shred the safety net as much as possible, attacks on the EPA, the CFPB and Dodd-Frank. Elections have consequences and at least some of these horrible things will inevitably happen. I’m not sure that we can fight all of them. And I don’t know where Democrats would get by being simply the party of “No”, as the GOP was for six years, especially since they are in the minority. There has to be resistance, but it has to be smart and constructive resistance, with apositive message underlying it. And there are lines in the sand that must be drawn that will lead to bloody fights.

Trump is a sort of different matter. It is important to call him out on his endless false statements and the fact that his administration is utterly feckless and incompetent. I  personally have no real hope that the Republicans will impeach him, but I think he can and will be weakened. But to obsess on every stupid tweet and crazy statement seems also to be self-defeating. It is important to make some distinctions over the merely idiotic and venal things he says and the things he says that threaten tyranny. There really is a difference between complaining about Nordstom’s and threatening the judiciary. We are teetering on the edge of an abyss. It is not hard to envision a situation in which the USA slips into tyrrany. What we do as a country over the next several months and years will have an inordinate impact on the future of the world. This is all frightening in a way that Reagan or W were not.

Marching on May and Other Thoughts

Another March: It seems like the Trump administration will feature an endless series of protests. His recent ban on Muslim immigration has led to protest rallies and marches around the globe. You have to wonder if these protests really accomplish anything. I certainly have absolutely no hope that they will sway Trump. And they are unlikely to move Theresa May much either (more on her below). But there is a chance that Members of Parliament and Senators and Congressmen will begin to have second thoughts. And it is also possible, if this level of activism can be maintained for two years, that we might be able to see some local electoral success, as Americans tire of Trump and the politicians who are too spineless to stand up to him.

The protest of Monday was at No. 10 Downing Street. (Well, actually near it. Downing Street is always blocked off and guarded. So the rally was at the Whitehall end of that block-long street.) It was mainly in response to Trump’s horrifying, unconstitutional and foolish executive order banning certain Muslim immigration, which has Bannon’s fingerprints all over it. But it was as much an anti-Theresa May march as an anti-Trump one. She had a fawning visit with Trump last Friday, the very day of the executive order. It is clear that she had some knowledge of the order in advance and said nothing. When it came out, she refused to denounce it or even take a position. It was only as the ban and May were roundly criticized, that she issued a weak statement. The turning point was probably when Mo Farah, the four-time gold medal winning distance runner (who was recently knighted), wrote that, because he was born in Somalia, he would not be able to train in America, which is where his family currently lives. Perhaps it was the idea of Donald mistreating Sir Mo that moved May to act. May seems to feel that she has to support Trump. The prospect of a trade deal with the US as some sort of window dressing to counter the clear disaster that losing access to the EU market poses, has May panting at Donald’s heels like a forlorn puppy. Ans since she has completely given in to the anti-immigration position of the far right, she may feel that she has to support all anti-immigration efforts, no matter how ill-conceived and unlawful.

The New Unity group managed to get itself organized without my help and we had a decent turnout. We carried both our banners and were in the midst of a crowd of more than 20,000 (possibly quite a bit more). Photos below. While all of this was going on, a petition to Parliament seeking the withdrawal of the invitation to a royal visit given to Trump got over a million signatures in hours. The House of Commons has to debate a petition that gets over 100,000 signatures, which should be entertaining. But there is no chance that May will withdraw the invitation to her new BFF and imagined lifeline.

Another Thing I will Miss About London: The New Unity Congregation. Last Sunday was typical in some ways and not at all typical in others. Judie was out of the country, so went alone, which meant that I didn’t get there early so Judie could go to choir practice. It was the beginning of the pledge drive. The had never really done a UU-style drive before. This was partly because they own two buildings in fairly high-end areas and thus can cover 60-70% of their budget with rental income. And the government supports charities like New Unity, adding more to budget line. As a result, they only need to raise £35,000 or so from the congregation, an absurdly small figure. Of course, it is an unusually young group, with a good number of students and twenty-somethings Just beginning their working careers, so it is not a terribly well-heeled bunch. I had been giving the new treasurer some advice on fundraising and one bit of wisdom was to have a time for testimonials in the services during the pledge drive period. To open the drive, they had four testimonials plus me. I ended up giving the final little speech about why we were making a significant pledge to New Unity and everyone else should as well. It was a good one (a barn-burner), in which I went through the many things that we get from New Unity and concluding that making a pledge is not an obligation, but a privilege. I will miss the opportunity to speak at New Unity.

After the service, I decided to go to the first meeting of the New Unity Men’s Group, even though I was not going to be around much longer. Compared to the UU Montclair group, it was more than a generation younger. In Montclair, the ages of the group ran from about 40 to the 80s. At New Unity, I was the second oldest participant and over half the men who showed up for the first meeting were under 30. There was a very open discussion, including a fascinating time when we talked about what it means to be a man today. I’m sorry that I won’t get to see how this group develops.

Painting: I’ve just started two new paintings. In one of them, I am trying out the gouache paint that I received as a gift from Karen and Jerry Fried. I was having so much fun that I utterly forgot that Judie’s Women’s Group was using the flat on Wednesday night. Fortunately the place was not a mess. I’m starting to think about when I will have to stop painting and start packing up the paintings and supplies. I’d say no more than two more after the current three in progress.

Off to Lisbon Soon: Our old friends, Andrea and Peter, are arriving literally any moment and we will leave with them on Saturday for a long weekend in Lisbon. So I really need to wind this up.